Some of the most fundamental functions in R, in my opinion, are those that deal with probability distributions. Whenever you compute a *P*-value you rely on a probability distribution, and there are many types out there. In this exercise I will cover four: Bernoulli, Binomial, Poisson, and Normal distributions. Let me begin with some theory first:

### Bernoulli

Think of Bernoulli as a single coin flip, with probability of success the coin will land heads. Let be the random variable defining the outcome of the coin flip, and it will follow a distribution of the form

with mean * * and variance . Because there are only two possible outcomes (*i.e.* the coin lands either heads or tails) this distribution will necessarily be characterised by a probability mass function (PMF), as any other probability distribution dealing with discrete outcomes such as the Binomial and Poisson we will discuss later on.

### Binomial

Think of Binomial as multiple independent Bernoulli trials, each with probabily of success the coin will land heads. Let be the random variable defining the number of successes in trials, and it will follow a distribution of the form

with mean (same as MLE) and variance . Notice that the variance of the Bernoulli and Binomial distributions is maximum when (makes sense right? You are less certain about a binary outcome with 0.5 compared to any other value). There are possible outcomes, and the probability of each of of them is defined as

so the probability of landing heads only once in 20 fair coin flips, for example, would be

turning out to be very, very unlikely.

### Poisson

Think of Poisson as a the number of goals in a football match. Let be the random variable defining the number of occurrences in a given context with a rate of , and it will follow a distribution of the form

with being both the mean and the variance. Note that unlike the Bernoulli and Binomial, we use the Poisson distribution to model data in the context of unlimited occurrences.

### Normal

Think of the Normal a.k.a. Gaussian distribution as the daily revenue from a local store. Let be the unbiased random variable defining a quantity in a population, and it will follow a distribution of the form

with mean and variance . Because there are infinite outcomes this distribution will necessarily be characterised by a probability density function (PDF). The Normal distribution has interesting properties that leverage many statistical applications:

- The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) posits that no matter the shape of a particular distribution, the distribution of the sample mean () will follow a Normal distribution with and . This is key for distinguishing populations.
- The 68-95-99.7 rule posits that 68, 95 and 99.7% of the observations are contained in the intervals , and , respectively.
- The standard Normal is also a cornerstone in statistics. It simplifies many calculations since . Variable standardization (
*Z-*normalization) is nothing else but transforming a normally-distributed sample into a standard Normal using , which explicitly mean-centers the data and scales for unit-variance (UV). This is often one of the first steps in predictive and inference modeling.

**Let’s get started with R**

We will now explore these distributions in R. Functions dealing with probability distributions in R have a single-letter prefix that defines the type of function we want to use. These prefixes are **d**, **p**, **q** and **r**. They refer to **density/mass**, **cumulative**, **quantile** and **sampling** functions, respectively. We will combine these prefixes with the names of the distributions we are interested in, which are **binom **(Bernoulli and Binomial), **pois **(Poisson) and **norm **(Normal). Note that a Binomial distribution with is equivalent to a Bernoulli distribution, for the same value of .

For starters, let us go back to the 20 coin flips example using and plot the mass function of . We first generate a vector with the sequence of numbers 1,2,…20 and iterate the function over these values.

n <- 1:20 | |

den <- dbinom(n, 20, 0.7) | |

plot(den, ylab = "Density", xlab = "Number of successes") | |

sum(den) # = 1 |

The probability is maximum for . Note that the area under mass/density functions must be one.

Let us now turn to a different problem: the daily revenue of a local store follows a distribution with and . What is the probability that the revenue of today will be at least 1200EUR?

pnorm(1200,1000,200) # this gives us prob x smaller than 1200eur | |

1-pnorm(1200,1000,200) # this is the one, x greater than 1200eur |

This probability is .

How about reversing the question? This is where quantiles become handy.

qnorm(1-0.16,1000,200) # = 1198.892 |

So not surprisingly, the 84th quantile is 1200EUR.

Finally, a demonstration of the CLT. Let us start with a Poisson distribution with a density that will look like this,

n <- 1:20 | |

den <- dpois(n, 3) | |

plot(den, xlab = "Outcome", ylab = "Density") |

and we will draw 100 samples of 10 observations each. In each sample we will take the average value only. I will use **set.seed** to ensure you will draw the same random samples I did.

myMeans <- vector() | |

for(i in 1:100){ | |

set.seed(i) | |

myMeans <- c(myMeans, mean(rpois(10,3))) | |

} | |

hist(myMeans, main = NULL, xlab = expression(bar(x))) |

Looks not as normal as expected? That is because of the sample size. If you re-run the code above and replace 10 with 1000, you will obtain the following histogram.

Not only does the increased sample size improve the bell-shape, it also reduces the variance. Using the CLT we could successfully approximate . As you might realize, the CLT is more easily observed when variables are continuous.

Concluding,

- Model your data with the appropriate distribution according to the underlying assumptions. There is a tendency for disregarding simple distributions, when in fact they can help the most.
- While the definition of the Binomial and Poisson distributions is relatively straightforward, it is not so easy to ascertain ‘normality’ in a distribution of a continuous variable. A Box-Cox transformation might be helpful in resolving distributions skewed to different extents (and sign) into a Normal one.
- There are many other distributions out there – Exponential, Gamma, Beta, etc. The rule of the prefixes aforementioned for R still applies (
*e.g.***pgamma**,**rbeta**).

Enjoy!

waiting for more 🙂

LikeLiked by 1 person

obviously know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

LikeLike

Thank you! Please do start a blog and leave me a link 🙂

LikeLike